Publications

OBJECTIVE

Prior hypothesis-driven studies identified immunophenotypic characteristics associated with the control of HIV replication without antiretroviral therapy (HIV controllers) as well as with the degree of CD4 T-cell recovery during ART. We hypothesized that an unbiased 'discovery-based' approach might identify novel immunologic characteristics of these phenotypes.

DESIGN

We performed immunophenotyping on four 'aviremic' patient groups: HIV controllers (n = 98), antiretroviral-treated immunologic nonresponders (CD4 < 350; n = 59), antiretroviral-treated immunologic responders (CD4 > 350, n = 142), and as a control group HIV-negative adults (n = 43). We measured levels of T-cell maturation, activation, dysfunction, senescence, functionality, and proliferation.

METHODS

Supervised learning assessed the relative importance of immune parameters in predicting clinical phenotypes (controller, immunologic responder, or immunologic nonresponder). Unsupervised learning clustered immune parameters and examined if these clusters corresponded to clinical phenotypes.

RESULTS

HIV controllers were characterized by high percentages of HIV-specific T-cell responses and decreased percentages of cells expressing human leukocytic antigen-antigen D related in naive, central memory, and effector T-cell subsets. Immunologic nonresponders were characterized by higher percentages of CD4 T cells that were TNFα+ or INFγ+, higher percentages of activated naive and central memory T cells, and higher percentages of cells expressing programmed cell death protein 1. Unsupervised learning found two distinct clusters of controllers and two distinct clusters of immunologic nonresponders, perhaps suggesting different mechanisms for the clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our discovery-based approach confirmed previously reported characteristics that distinguish aviremic individuals, but also identified novel immunologic phenotypes and distinct clinical subpopulations that should lead to more focused pathogenesis studies that might identify targets for novel therapeutic interventions.

PURPOSE

Catheter ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is effective and safe, but efficacy is frequently limited due to an epicardial origin and difficult anatomy. The remote magnetic navigation (RMN) catheter has a flexible catheter design allowing access to difficult anatomy. We describe the efficacy of the RMN for ablation of idiopathic VA after failed manual ablation.

METHODS

Among 235 patients with idiopathic VA referred for catheter ablation, we identified 51 patients who were referred for repeat ablation after a failed manual ablation. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, including the successful ablation site and findings at electrophysiology study, in repeat procedures conducted using RMN as compared with manual ablation. Among these patients, 22 (43 %) underwent repeat ablation with the RMN and 29 (57 %) underwent repeat ablation with a manual ablation.

RESULTS

Overall, successful ablation rate was significantly higher using RMN as compared with manual ablation (91 vs. 69 %, P = 0.02). Fluoroscopy time in the RMN was 17 ± 12 min as compared with 43 ± 18 min in the manual ablation (P = 0.009). Successful ablation rate in the posterior right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) plus posterior-tricuspid annulus was higher with RMN as compared with manual ablation (92 vs. 50 %, P = 0.03). Neither groups exhibited any major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMN is more effective in selected patients with recurrent idiopathic VA after failed manual ablation and is associated with less fluoroscopy time. The RMN catheters have a flexible design enabling them to access otherwise difficult anatomy including the posterior tricuspid annulus and posterior RVOT.