Publications

Men who have sex with men are disproportionately impacted by HIV and substance use is a key driver of HIV risk and transmission among this population. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3242 HIV-negative substance-using men who have sex with men aged 18 + in the San Francisco Bay Area from March 2009 to May 2012. Demographic characteristics and sexual risk and substance use behaviors in the last six months were collected using structured telephone questionnaires. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify independent demographic and behavioral predictors of recent HIV testing. In all, 65% reported having an HIV test in the last six months. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.84-0.90) and drinking alcohol (<1 drink/day: 0.65, 0.46-0.92; 2-3 drinks/day: 0.64, 0.45-0.91; 4 + drinks/day: 0.52, 0.35-0.78) were negatively associated with recent HIV testing. Having two or more condomless anal intercourse partners (2.17, 1.69-2.79) was positively associated with having a recent HIV test, whereas condomless anal intercourse with serodiscordant partners was not significantly associated with testing. Older men who have sex with men and those who drink alcohol may benefit from specific targeting in efforts to expand HIV testing. Inherently riskier discordant serostatus of partners is not as significant a motivator of HIV testing as condomless anal intercourse in general.

Marriage is linked to improved colorectal cancer-related health, likely in part through preventive health behaviors, but it is unclear what role spouses play in colorectal cancer screening. We therefore determine whether self-reported colonoscopy rates are correlated within married couples and the characteristics of spouses associated with colonoscopy use in each partner. We use US nationally-representative 2010 data which includes 804 male-female married couples drawn from a total sample of 3137 community-dwelling adults aged 55-90years old. Using a logistic regression model in the full sample (N=3137), we first find married men have higher adjusted colonoscopy rates than unmarried men (61% versus 52%, p=0.023), but women's rates do not differ by marital status. In the couples' sample (N=804 couples), we use a bivariate probit regression model to estimate multiple regression equations for the two spouses simultaneously as a function of individual and spousal covariates, as well as the adjusted correlation within couples. We find that individuals are nearly twice as likely to receive a colonoscopy if their spouse recently has had one (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.39, 2.67, p<0.001). Additionally, we find that husbands have higher adjusted colonoscopy rates whose wives are: 1) happier with the marital relationship (65% vs 51%, p=0.020); 2) more highly educated (72% vs 51%, p=0.020), and 3) viewed as more supportive (65% vs 52%, p=0.020). Recognizing the role of marital status, relationship quality, and spousal characteristics on colonoscopy uptake, particularly in men, could help physicians increase guideline adherence.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of posttreatment FDG PET/CT in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) treated with primary surgical resection with or without adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 98 HNSCC patients were treated with primary surgical resection and had undergone PET/CT within 6 months of treatment completion. The accuracy of the scans and the added value to clinical assessment and impact on management were established based on the clinical information before and after each scan. Overall survival of patients was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of the total 98 scans, 25 (25.5%) were interpreted as positive and 73 (74.5%) as negative. The sensitivity of posttreatment PET/CT was 80.0%; specificity, 89.5%; positive predictive value, 66.7%; negative predictive value, 94.4%; and accuracy, 87.5%. These scans were helpful in excluding tumor in 31.8% of patients with clinical suspicion of residual disease and identifying suspected residual disease in 13.2% of patients with no prior clinical suspicion. Multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size, grade (p = 0.041), scan type (p = 0.002), and scan result (p = 0.005) were independent covariates associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference and association in overall survival between patients with a positive versus a negative posttherapy PET/CT scan result (hazard ratio, 5.65; 95% CI, 2.48-12.83; log rank Mantel-Cox p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Posttreatment FDG PET/CT results had a high negative predictive value, added value to clinical assessment of 35% of patients, influenced subsequent management, and were associated with survival outcome of HNSCC patients treated with primary surgical resection.