Publications

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (EPO) has generated interest as a novel therapy after myocardial infarction (MI), but the safety and efficacy of prolonged therapy have not been studied in a large animal model of reperfused MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MI was induced in pigs by a 90-minute balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Sixteen animals were randomized to either EPO or saline (control group). Inflammatory markers, bone marrow cell mobilization, and left ventricular function (by both echocardiography and pressure-volume measurements) were assessed at baseline, 1 and 6 weeks post-MI. EPO therapy was associated with a significant increase in hemoglobin and mononuclear counts. D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels did not differ between groups. At week 6, EPO therapy prevented further deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction (39 +/- 2% vs. 33 +/- 1%, P < .01) and improved wall motion score index (P < .02). Histopathology revealed increased areas of viable myocardium, vascular density, and capillary-to-myocyte ratio in the EPO therapy compared with the control (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged EPO therapy after MI in a large animal model is safe and leads to an increase in viable myocardium, increased vascular density, and prevents further deterioration of left ventricular function. These results support future clinical studies in post-MI patients.

Non-invasive evaluation of diastolic function continues to play a critical role in furthering our understanding of diastole, improving the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction, evaluating left ventricular filling pressures, and providing important prognostic information for patients with heart failure. Echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and nuclear cardiology each provide important tools for evaluating diastolic performance. This review will focus on the techniques from multiple cardiovascular imaging modalities which have been used for the clinical assessment of diastolic function.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether rectal testing among women increased chlamydia and gonorrhea case-finding and whether reported receptive anal intercourse was a risk factor for rectal infection.

METHODS

From March 2007 to August 2008, women receiving pelvic examinations at the San Francisco sexually transmitted disease clinic were tested for rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia by using a transcription-mediated amplification assay. Results of testing and clinical and demographic data were analyzed using a cross-sectional study design.

RESULTS

Of 1,308 women with both rectal and vaginal tests, test results were positive for 79 patients (6.0%) for rectal chlamydia or gonorrhea and 88 patients (6.7%) for genital chlamydia or gonorrhea. Test results were positive for 13 patients (1.0%) at the rectum only, increasing detection from 88 to 101 patients (14.8%; 95% confidence interval 8.1-23.9). No correlation existed between reported anal sex and rectal chlamydia (P=.74); however, 50% of women with rectal gonorrhea reported anal sex compared with 21% of women without rectal gonorrhea (P=.002).

CONCLUSION

Sexually transmitted disease clinics might improve chlamydia and gonorrhea case-finding through rectal testing of women, but more study is needed to determine the effects of finding and treating such infections. Reporting anal intercourse did not predict rectal chlamydial infection among women tested at both the rectum and the vagina.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.