Publications

It is uncertain whether occult hepatitis B virus co-infection will hasten progressive liver disease in chronic hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. This study evaluated fibrosis progression and severe fibrosis in 118 consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patients with virological and histological evidence of recurrent chronic hepatitis C infection co-infected with occult hepatitis B virus after liver transplantation. HBV DNA was detected from serum at the time of recurrent chronic hepatitis C infection by polymerase chain reaction. Each subject underwent a repeat liver biopsy 5 years post-liver transplantation. Occult hepatitis B virus co-infection was present in 41 of the 118 (34.7%) patients. At 5 years post-liver transplantation, 13 of the 41 occult hepatitis B virus co-infected patients compared with 16 of the 77 patients without occult hepatitis B virus co-infection developed fibrosis progression (31.7% vs. 20.8%, respectively, p = 0.39). Eight of 41 the occult hepatitis B virus co-infected patients compared with 13 of the 77 patients without occult hepatitis B virus co-infection had severe fibrosis (19.5% vs. 16.9%, respectively, p = 0.97). In conclusion, occult hepatitis B virus co-infection in patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C infection was not associated with accelerated fibrosis progression or severe fibrosis after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to further explore the severity of liver disease and its predictors in a cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients, some of whom were coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients undergoing liver biopsy to stage HCV disease prior to consideration of anti-HCV therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 92 HIV-HCV coinfected and 372 HCV monoinfected patients were included. As might be expected, coinfected patients differed from monoinfected patients in a number of ways, including having lower body mass index (BMI), and lower alcohol intake. Liver disease was very similar between the two groups, with mean fibrosis score of 1.45 u for coinfected and 1.53 u for monoinfected (p = NS). Histological inflammation score dominated multivariate models of fibrosis when it was included in them. When only clinical predictors were used in multivariate models, BMI and type 2 diabetes had independent associations in monoinfected patients, whereas low CD4 count, current or nadir, was the only variable with an independent association in coinfected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Coinfected patients do not have uniformly worse liver disease than monoinfected patients. Immune compromise plays an important role in liver disease in coinfected patients, and the role of other clinical factors in liver disease may differ between these two groups, as well.